• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
Williams Edelstein Tucker Fair Housing Firm

Fair Housing Attorneys Williams Edelstein Tucker, P.C.

Fair Housing Consultation, Training, and Representation

  • Home
    • About Us
  • Legal Services
  • Fair Housing Training
  • Resources
    • Fair Housing Firm Library
    • Newsletter
  • Forms
    • Assistance Animals
    • Liability
    • Reasonable Accommodation
    • Bundle
  • My account
    • Cart
    • Checkout
  • Contact Us
  • Show Search
Hide Search
Home/Policy Procedures/Race, Retaliation, and a Landmark Fair Housing Verdict – Episode 43
Attorney Leslie Tucker discusses a case around race and retaliation.

Race, Retaliation, and a Landmark Fair Housing Verdict – Episode 43

Fair housing laws apply to every dwelling, regardless of its size, location, or ownership structure. That reality was brought into sharp focus in Commonwealth of Virginia v. Regina Turner, a case involving a small Virginia campground and a jury verdict that sent shockwaves through the industry.

This case, and the $750,000* judgment that followed, is a clear reminder that compliance with fair housing laws isn’t just for large apartment communities—it’s for everyone in housing.


Case Files

What Happened at Lazy Cove Campground?

Angela and Damien, an interracial married couple, leased a campsite at Lazy Cove Campground in Franklin County, Virginia. Angela, who is white, finalized the lease with the property owner, Regina Turner, during a visit with her son. Damien, who is Black, was not present at the time.

After the couple began using the site regularly, Regina saw Damien for the first time and soon after began telling other tenants she wouldn’t have rented to Angela had she known she was married to a Black man. She expressed explicit racial bias, even referencing the couple’s biracial son in a derogatory way.

After becoming aware of the owner’s comments to other tenants, Angela and Damien felt that they could not continue to lease the campsite, even though they loved spending time there. However, Regina allegedly refused to let them sell their camper on-site (which is how they had purchased it) and ultimately forced them to remove it entirely, despite having no lease violations or behavioral issues.

Legal Action and the Largest Housing Verdict in State History

Angela and Damien filed a fair housing complaint, which led to a formal charge by the Virginia Fair Housing Office. The Virginia Attorney General’s office took the case to trial, where witness testimony—including a recorded conversation between the owner and another tenant—solidified the case against Regina Turner.

The jury awarded the family $100,000 in compensatory damages and a staggering $550,000 in punitive damages. The case now stands as the largest housing discrimination verdict in the state’s history.

Fair Housing Applies to Everyone—Even Campgrounds

This wasn’t a high-rise apartment or a multifamily housing corporation. It was a privately owned campground. But because the site was a rented dwelling, the Fair Housing Act applied in full force.

That’s a crucial reminder for all landlords, managers, and property owners, regardless of the size of their operations.

Key Lessons for Property Managers and Housing Providers

This case highlights several essential lessons for anyone involved in the housing sector. First, discrimination based on race is illegal. That means treating someone differently because of the race of their spouse, family member, or guest is a direct violation of fair housing law. Second, documentation matters. Without any record of lease violations or behavioral issues, actions like non-renewals can appear—and be proven—as discriminatory. 

Third, words matter. Casual comments or jokes, even if not intended for a wide audience, can become damaging evidence in court. Lastly, ongoing fair housing training is critical. While training can’t eliminate personal bias, it can reinforce legal responsibilities and help prevent unlawful decisions. This case serves as a strong reminder that professionalism, compliance, and education are non-negotiable in the housing industry.

Compliance Is the Foundation of Trust

Whether you manage hundreds of apartment units or a handful of campsites, your duty to uphold fair housing laws remains the same. Training, documentation, and consistent practices aren’t just tools to avoid lawsuits; they’re a sign of integrity and professionalism.

Let this case serve as a powerful reminder: discrimination doesn’t have to be overt to be unlawful. And when it is overt, the consequences, financial, legal, and reputational, can be severe.

Stay informed. Stay compliant. And always lead with fairness.

*Please note that while not stated, another family was involved in this case and was also awarded $100,000.00

SUBSCRIBE

You Might Also Like:

  • Case Files: Evicted After Calling the Police—What the Law Says – Episode 44
  • Race, Retaliation, and a Landmark Fair Housing Verdict – Episode 43
  • Case Files: A Decade Later—and Still Accountable – Episode 42
  • Case Files: When HUD Pulled the Plug on Fair Housing Grants – Episode 41
  • Case Files: United States v. Airbnb – Episode 40

Written by:
Williams Edelstein Tucker
Published on:
July 29, 2025

Categories: Policy Procedures

Discover more

Online Fair Housing Training Services Contact Us
Williams Edelstein Tucker Fair Housing Firm

Footer

Williams Edelstein Tucker

7742 Spalding Drive Suite 478

Peachtree Corners, GA., 30092

Copyright © 2025 Williams Edelstein Ticker, P.C. · Website by Market Me Social Inc.

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy